CADUCEUS (expert system) - significado y definición. Qué es CADUCEUS (expert system)
Diclib.com
Diccionario ChatGPT
Ingrese una palabra o frase en cualquier idioma 👆
Idioma:

Traducción y análisis de palabras por inteligencia artificial ChatGPT

En esta página puede obtener un análisis detallado de una palabra o frase, producido utilizando la mejor tecnología de inteligencia artificial hasta la fecha:

  • cómo se usa la palabra
  • frecuencia de uso
  • se utiliza con más frecuencia en el habla oral o escrita
  • opciones de traducción
  • ejemplos de uso (varias frases con traducción)
  • etimología

Qué (quién) es CADUCEUS (expert system) - definición

MEDICAL EXPERT SYSTEM

CADUCEUS (expert system)         
CADUCEUS was a medical expert system finished in the mid-1980s (first begun in the 1970s- it took a long time to build the knowledge base) by Harry Pople (of the University of Pittsburgh), building on Pople's years of interviews with Dr. Jack Meyers, one of the top internal medicine diagnosticians and a professor at the University of Pittsburgh.
expert testimony         
WITNESS WHO IS BELIEVED TO HAVE EXPERTISE AND SPECIALISED KNOWLEDGE IN A PARTICULAR SUBJECT BEYOND THAT OF THE AVERAGE PERSON
Expert witnesses; Expert source; Expert testimony; Expert Testimony; Scientific evidence (law); Expert Witness; Expert opinion; Expert evidence; Forensic witness; Forensic testimony; Professional witness; Judicial expert; Sociomedical assessment
n. opinions stated during trial or deposition (testimony under oath before trial) by a specialist qualified as an expert on a subject relevant to a lawsuit or a criminal case. See also: expert witness
expert witness         
WITNESS WHO IS BELIEVED TO HAVE EXPERTISE AND SPECIALISED KNOWLEDGE IN A PARTICULAR SUBJECT BEYOND THAT OF THE AVERAGE PERSON
Expert witnesses; Expert source; Expert testimony; Expert Testimony; Scientific evidence (law); Expert Witness; Expert opinion; Expert evidence; Forensic witness; Forensic testimony; Professional witness; Judicial expert; Sociomedical assessment
n. a person who is a specialist in a subject, often technical, who may present his/her expert opinion without having been a witness to any occurrence relating to the lawsuit or criminal case. It is an exception to the rule against giving an opinion in trial, provided that the expert is qualified by evidence of his/her expertise, training and special knowledge. If the expertise is challenged, the attorney for the party calling the "expert" must make a showing of the necessary background through questions in court, and the trial judge has discretion to qualify the witness or rule he/she is not an expert, or is an expert on limited subjects. Experts are usually paid handsomely for their services and may be asked by the opposition the amount they are receiving for their work on the case. In most jurisdictions, both sides must exchange the names and addresses of proposed experts to allow pre-trial depositions. See also: expert testimony

Wikipedia

CADUCEUS (expert system)

CADUCEUS was a medical expert system - an early type of recommender system - by Harry Pople of the University of Pittsburgh. Finished in the mid-1980s, it was built on the INTERNIST-1 algorithm (1972-1973). In its time, CADUCEUS was described as the "most knowledge-intensive expert system in existence". CADUCEUS eventually could diagnose up to 1000 different diseases.

The knowledge base was built on Pople's years of interviews with Dr. Jack Meyers, one of the top internal medicine diagnosticians and a professor at the University of Pittsburgh. Their motivation was to improve on MYCIN, a recommender which focused on blood-borne infectious bacteria and instead embrace all internal medicine.

While CADUCEUS worked using an inference engine similar to MYCIN's, it made a number of changes. As there can be a number of simultaneous diseases, and data is generally flawed and scarce it incorporated abductive reasoning to deal with the additional complexity of internal disease. A disease can manifest a set of signs and symptoms, and a manifestation can, in turn, evoke a disease. Relationships between symptoms and diagnosis were ranked from 0 to 5. 5 indicated that the symptom is always associated with the disease, while 0 indicated that the association was ambiguous. An initial list of symptoms entered by the practitioner would be evaluated by the program to suggest possible diseases related to these combinations. These predictions were improved from INTERNIST-I by the use of constrictor relationships.